April 3, 2025
Marjorie Just
Many people would like to bring a family member or friend with them to meet with their divorce lawyer, or potential divorce lawyer. There are many reasons a family member or friend would be helpful:
The downside to having a third party present during your meeting is that this person’s presence generally destroys the attorney-client privilege. Everything that is said by anyone in that meeting is no longer privileged, and someone could be required to state at a deposition or in written discovery something that was said during that meeting.
When relaying general facts that you don’t consider to be very private, it may not be crucial for such information to be covered by the privilege, such as the date of the marriage, whether you have children, your and your spouse’s employment, etc. Other things may be more private, that you do want subject to the privilege, such as the circumstances of the separation, any domestic violence, any unfaithfulness, substance abuse or circumstances of your children that you want to keep private.
It is a good idea to think in advance of your meeting about whether there are any facts, circumstances or events that you want to relay to your lawyer, but want to keep confidential. In addition, your lawyer may be comfortable telling you general information about the divorce process, the court process, dispute resolution options, etc., and then prefer to give you specific legal advice privately, in a confidential setting. Your friend or family member would need to leave the room for this aspect of your conversation with your lawyer to be confidential and privileged.
As a result, I often ask clients who bring friends or family members to meetings to consider keeping that person in the room for the first part of a meeting while you relay commonly known facts or questions, and then after that ask the third party to leave the meeting, so you can also have a privileged conversation with your lawyer to relay private information and hear legal advice about it.